基础法律英语辅导热招
您的位置:外语教育网 > 法律英语 > 英文法规 > 正文

最高人民法院关于审理涉及计算机网络域名民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释 Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law to the Trial of Civil Dispute Cases Involving Computer Network Domain Names Interpretation

2006-05-13 16:08   我要纠错 | 打印 | 收藏 | | |

法释[2001]24号
(Promulgated by the Supreme People's Court on 17 July 2001 and effective as of 24 July 2001.)
颁布日期:20010717  实施日期:20010724  颁布单位:最高人民法院

  In accordance with laws such as the PRC, Civil Law General Principles (the Civil Law General Principles), the PRC, Anti-unfair Competition Law (the Anti-unfair Competition Law) and the PRC, Civil Procedure Law (the Civil Procedure Law), we hereby give the following interpretation in order to cause civil dispute cases concerning the registration and/or use, etc. of computer network domain names (Domain Name Dispute Cases) to be tried correctly.

  Article 1 Where a party to a civil dispute concerning the registration and/or use, etc. of (a) domain name(s) files a suit with a people's court, the people's court should accept the case if, after examination, it finds the same to accord with Article 108 of the Civil Procedure Law.

  Article 2 Intermediate people's courts of the place of the infringement or the place of the defendant's domicile shall have jurisdiction over infringement disputes involving domain names. Where the place of the infringement and the place of the defendant's domicile are difficult to determine, the location of the equipment, such as a computer terminal, through which the plaintiff discovered the domain name(s) may be regarded as the place of the infringement.

  Foreign-related Domain Name Dispute Cases include cases in which one or both of the parties are foreigners, stateless persons, foreign enterprises or organizations or international organizations, or in which the domain name(s) in question is (are) registered abroad. For foreign-related Domain Name Dispute Cases occurring within the territory of the People's Republic of China, jurisdiction shall be determined according to the provisions of Section Four of the Civil Procedure Law.

  Article 3 Cause of action for Domain Name Dispute Cases shall be determined in accordance with the character of the legal relationship of the dispute between the parties. The cause of action shall commence with the phrase "computer network domain name". If the character of the legal relationship of the dispute is difficult to determine, it may be generally referred to as a "computer network domain name dispute case".

  Article 4 When trying a Domain Name Dispute Case, the people's court should determine that the defendant's registration and/or use, etc. of a domain name constitutes infringement or unfair competition if each of the following criteria is satisfied:

  1. the civil rights or interests for which the plaintiff seeks protection are legitimate and effective;

  2. the defendant's domain name or its main part constitutes a copy, imitation, translation or transliteration of a well-known trademark of the plaintiff; or it is identical with or similar to a registered trademark, domain name, etc. of the plaintiff to a degree sufficient to cause mistaken identification among the relevant public;

  3. the defendant does not enjoy rights or interests to the domain name or its main part, and has no justification to register and/or use the domain name; and

  4. the defendant's registration and/or use of the domain name is in bad faith.

  Article 5 The people's court should determine that the defendant acted in bad faith if his conduct is shown to constitute any one of the following:

  1. for commercial purposes, registering another's well-known trademark as a domain name;

  2. for commercial purposes, registering and/or using a domain name that is the same as or similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark, domain name, etc., and deliberately causing confusion with the products and/or services provided by the plaintiff or with the plaintiff's website in order to mislead network users into accessing one's own website or another online site;

  3. having offered to sell, lease or otherwise transfer the domain name at a high price and obtained unfair benefits;

  4. the defendant neither uses nor intends to use the domain name after registration, but intentionally prevents the registration of the domain name by the person holding rights therein;

  5. other situations involving bad faith.

  If the defendant produces evidence that the domain name(s) he owns has (have) gained a certain degree of notoriety before the dispute occurred, and is (are) distinct from the plaintiff's registered trademark(s), domain name(s), etc., or if there are other circumstances sufficient to show that he has not acted in bad faith, the people's court is not required to determine that the defendant acted in bad faith.

  Article 6 When trying a Domain Name Dispute Case, the people's court may determine according to law whether a registered trademark involved is well-known or not based on a party's requests and the actual circumstances of the case.

  Article 7 When trying a Domain Name Dispute Case that satisfies the criteria set forth in Article 4 hereof and, according to the relevant law(s), constitutes infringement, the people's court should apply the stipulations of the corresponding law(s). If the case constitutes unfair competition, the people's court may apply Article 4 of the Civil Law General Principles and the first paragraph of Article 2 of the Anti-unfair Competition Law.

  Foreign-related Domain Name Dispute Cases should be handled according to the relevant provisions of Part Eight of the Civil Procedure Law.

  Article 8 Once the people's court determines that conduct such as the registration and/or use of a domain name constitutes infringement or unfair competition, it may order the defendant to cease the infringement and/or deregister the domain name, or, at the request of the plaintiff, order that the domain name be registered and used by the plaintiff. If the said conduct has caused actual damage to the holder of the rights, the people's court may order the defendant to pay damages.

相关资讯:
网站导航:
 四六级 指南 动态 经验 试题 资料  托福 指南 动态 经验 留学 备考
 雅思 指南 动态 机经 经验 辅导  公共英语 指南 动态 备考 试题 辅导
 日语 就业 辅导 留学 考试 报考  法语 资料 文化 考试 留学 辅导
 韩语 入门 口语 阅读 留学 文化  西语 辅导 资料 考试 留学 风采
基础法律英语
350元/门
系统讲解知识,全面提升水平
课时数:18课时左右
学员 tueiwi:
自我感觉LEC考得不错,感谢外语教育网的法律英语课程老师。
学员 tyjf:
外语教育网的法律英语信息不错,希望有朝一日可以成为法律达人,顶起!
学员 Alice12345:
我报的是法律英语的辅导班。因为英语底子不太好,一直没有太大的进步。后来,我在外语教育网报名参加了网上培训。感觉老师很负责。课程内容也详细。在老师的帮助下,感觉我的法律英语的水平得到了长足的提高。很感谢法律英语的老师的教导。谢谢老师!
学员 lionm:
一直在学法律英语,但总是找不到门路。不但单词多,而且本来认识的单词意思又变了,头痛死了。听了李文沛老师的法律英语课程后,我觉得好多了。希望能网校的法律英语课程能继续开个中级班。
学员 xyz521:
我一直在找法律英语的课程都没找到,偶然的机会来到外语教育网,发现这里的法律英语的课程真的很不错、信息也很齐全,绝对支持哦!
学员 futami:
以前自己看书,感觉非常吃力,很多地方看不懂。抱着试试看的心理,我报名参加了外语教育网的基础法律英语辅导。沙老师和李老师讲得非常好,重点、难点,经过老师的系统讲解,我都基本掌握了。就连冥思苦想都不能解决的难题,也通过答疑板请教老师而得到了满意的答复。在此衷心感谢网校的老师。
学员 hnigni:
我是法律专业的本科生,因为工作的需要,必须得会法律英语,可之前在学校的时候没好好学过啊。正头疼,同事推荐了外语教育网,于是我就报了名,开始学习。在学习过程中,发现沙老师的课真的很不错,她不但英语口语发音标准,而且她授课的内容通俗易懂,很方便我们接受和学习。另外,外语教育网的教学模式很适合我这种已经参加了工作的人,可以让我兼顾工作和学习,也很不错。特此,到网上来赞一下沙老师!沙老师,谢谢您!也谢谢网校的良好服务!在外语教育网学习,真值!
版权声明
   1、凡本网注明 “来源:外语教育网”的所有作品,版权均属外语教育网所有,未经本网授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式使用;已经本网授权的,应在授权范围内使用,且必须注明“来源:外语教育网”。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其法律责任。
  2、本网部分资料为网上搜集转载,均尽力标明作者和出处。对于本网刊载作品涉及版权等问题的,请作者与本网站联系,本网站核实确认后会尽快予以处理。
  本网转载之作品,并不意味着认同该作品的观点或真实性。如其他媒体、网站或个人转载使用,请与著作权人联系,并自负法律责任。
  3、本网站欢迎积极投稿
  4、联系方式:
编辑信箱:for68@chinaacc.com
电话:010-82319999-2371