基础法律英语辅导热招
您的位置:外语教育网 > 法律英语 > 英文法规 > 正文

最高人民法院关于审理涉及计算机网络著作权纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释(修正) Supreme People's Court, Several Issues Concerning the Laws Applicable to the Trial of Copyright Disputes Involving Computer Networks Interpretations (Revised)

2006-05-12 22:59   我要纠错 | 打印 | 收藏 | | |

(Revised according to the > Decision> on 23 December 2003; promulgated on 2 January 2004 and effective as of 7 January 2004.)

颁布日期:20040102  实施日期:20040107  颁布单位:最高人民法院

  Pursuant to the provisions of such laws as the Civil Law General Principles, the Copyright Law and the Civil Procedure Law, the following interpretation of several issues concerning the laws applicable to the trial of copyright disputes involving computer networks is rendered in order to correctly hear such cases:

  Article 1 Copyright infringement cases involving networks shall fall within the jurisdiction of the people's court of the place where the infringement occurred or where the defendant has his domicile. The place where the infringement occurred shall include the place where such equipment as the network server and computer terminal involved in the alleged infringement is located. If the places where the infringement occurred and where the defendant has his domicile are difficult to determine, the place where such equipment as the computer terminal on which the plaintiff discovered the infringing content is located may be deemed to be the place where the infringement occurred.

  Article 2 Works protected by the Copyright Law include digital versions of the various types of works specified in Article 3 of the Copyright Law. The people's courts shall afford protection to results of intellectual creation that, in a network environment, are impossible to classify under the works enumerated in Article 3 of the Copyright Law but that are unique in the field of literature, art or science and that can be reproduced in a tangible form.

  Article 3 No infringement is constituted if a work that has been previously published in a newspaper or periodical or transmitted on a network is republished or excerpted on a network, and remuneration is paid and the source is indicated in accordance with relevant provisions, unless the copyright owner has declared, or the newspaper, periodical or network service provider has declared, at the behest of the copyright owner that such work may not be republished or excerpted. However, if the website's republication or excerpting of such work exceeds the scope within which works may be republished by newspapers or periodicals, such act shall be deemed an infringement.

  Article 4 If, by way of its network, a network service provider participates in, incites, or assists in, copyright infringement by a third party, the people's court shall pursue the joint liability for infringement of the network service provider and the other perpetrator(s) or the person that directly committed the infringement, pursuant to Article 130 of the Civil Law General Principles.

  Article 5 If a network service provider that provides content services is well aware that a network subscriber has used its network to infringe upon a third party's copyright, or the copyright owner has submitted a substantiated warning but the network service provider fails to take such measures as removing the infringing content so as to eliminate the consequences of the infringement, the people's court shall pursue the joint liability for infringement of the network service provider and the network subscriber pursuant to Article 130 of the Civil Law General Principles.

  Article 6 If a network service provider that provides content services refuses, without just cause, the request of a copyright owner to provide information on an infringer's registration with its network so as to pursue such infringer's liability for infringement, the people's court shall pursue the network service provider's attendant liability for infringement pursuant to Article 106 of the Civil Law General Principles.

  Article 7 If a network service provider uploads, transmits or provides methods, equipment or materials that are specifically used to circumvent or crack the technical protective measures for copyright of others and he is well aware of it, the people's court shall, on the basis of the claims of the parties and the details of the case, pursue the civil liability for infringement of the network service provider in accordance with Item (6) of Article 47 of the Copyright Law.

  Article 8 If a copyright owner discovers infringing information and issues a warning to the network service provider or requests information on the infringer's registration with the network but fails to provide proof of his own identity, proof of his copyright ownership or proof of the infringement, he shall be deemed not to have issued a warning or not to have made a request for the said registration information.

  If the network service provider still fails to take measures after the copyright owner has provided the aforementioned proof, the copyright owner may, prior to instituting an action, apply to the people's court for a ruling to cease the relevant acts, and to preserve the property and the evidence in accordance with Articles 49 and 50 of the Copyright Law. He may also, at the time he institutes an action, apply to the people's court for a provisional ruling to cease the infringement and interference and eliminate the effects. The people's court shall grant such application.

  Article 9 If a network service provider takes such measures as removing allegedly infringing content after being issued a substantiated warning by the copyright owner and the alleged infringer claims liability for breach of contract against the network service provider, the people's court shall reject such claim.

  If the copyright owner's allegation of infringement is false, and the alleged infringer claims damages for the losses incurred due to the measures taken by the network service provider, the people's court shall order the party that issued the warning to assume the liability for damages.

相关资讯:
网站导航:
 四六级 指南 动态 经验 试题 资料  托福 指南 动态 经验 留学 备考
 雅思 指南 动态 机经 经验 辅导  公共英语 指南 动态 备考 试题 辅导
 日语 就业 辅导 留学 考试 报考  法语 资料 文化 考试 留学 辅导
 韩语 入门 口语 阅读 留学 文化  西语 辅导 资料 考试 留学 风采
基础法律英语
350元/门
系统讲解知识,全面提升水平
课时数:18课时左右
学员 tueiwi:
自我感觉LEC考得不错,感谢外语教育网的法律英语课程老师。
学员 tyjf:
外语教育网的法律英语信息不错,希望有朝一日可以成为法律达人,顶起!
学员 Alice12345:
我报的是法律英语的辅导班。因为英语底子不太好,一直没有太大的进步。后来,我在外语教育网报名参加了网上培训。感觉老师很负责。课程内容也详细。在老师的帮助下,感觉我的法律英语的水平得到了长足的提高。很感谢法律英语的老师的教导。谢谢老师!
学员 lionm:
一直在学法律英语,但总是找不到门路。不但单词多,而且本来认识的单词意思又变了,头痛死了。听了李文沛老师的法律英语课程后,我觉得好多了。希望能网校的法律英语课程能继续开个中级班。
学员 xyz521:
我一直在找法律英语的课程都没找到,偶然的机会来到外语教育网,发现这里的法律英语的课程真的很不错、信息也很齐全,绝对支持哦!
学员 futami:
以前自己看书,感觉非常吃力,很多地方看不懂。抱着试试看的心理,我报名参加了外语教育网的基础法律英语辅导。沙老师和李老师讲得非常好,重点、难点,经过老师的系统讲解,我都基本掌握了。就连冥思苦想都不能解决的难题,也通过答疑板请教老师而得到了满意的答复。在此衷心感谢网校的老师。
学员 hnigni:
我是法律专业的本科生,因为工作的需要,必须得会法律英语,可之前在学校的时候没好好学过啊。正头疼,同事推荐了外语教育网,于是我就报了名,开始学习。在学习过程中,发现沙老师的课真的很不错,她不但英语口语发音标准,而且她授课的内容通俗易懂,很方便我们接受和学习。另外,外语教育网的教学模式很适合我这种已经参加了工作的人,可以让我兼顾工作和学习,也很不错。特此,到网上来赞一下沙老师!沙老师,谢谢您!也谢谢网校的良好服务!在外语教育网学习,真值!
版权声明
   1、凡本网注明 “来源:外语教育网”的所有作品,版权均属外语教育网所有,未经本网授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式使用;已经本网授权的,应在授权范围内使用,且必须注明“来源:外语教育网”。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其法律责任。
  2、本网部分资料为网上搜集转载,均尽力标明作者和出处。对于本网刊载作品涉及版权等问题的,请作者与本网站联系,本网站核实确认后会尽快予以处理。
  本网转载之作品,并不意味着认同该作品的观点或真实性。如其他媒体、网站或个人转载使用,请与著作权人联系,并自负法律责任。
  3、本网站欢迎积极投稿
  4、联系方式:
编辑信箱:for68@chinaacc.com
电话:010-82319999-2371