WOMEN IN POLITICS
My entrance into the House of Commons was not，as some thought，in the nature of a revolution.Itwas an evolution.My husband was the one whostarted me off on this downward path—from thefireside to public life.If I have helped the cause ofwomen he is the one to thank，not me.
A woman in the House of Commons！It was almost enough to have broken up the House.Idon't blame them—it was equally hard on thewoman as it was on them.A pioneer may be a pic－turesque figure，but they are often rather lonelyones.I must say for the House of Commons，theybore their shock with dauntless decency.No bodyof men could have been kinder and fairer to a“pi-rate”than they were.When you hear people overhere trying to run down England，please rememberthat England was the first large country to give thevote to women and that the men of England wel-comed an American born woman in the House witha fairness and a justice which，at least，this womannever will forget.
Women and politics—some women have al－ways been in politics，and have not done badly，ei- ther.It was when we had the Lancastrian Kingsthat it was said that the Kings were made Kings byact of Parliament—they did rule by means of Par－liament.Then Henry VIII，that old scalawag，ac-cepted the principles of the Lancastrians to rule byParliament，but he wanted the principle in an en－tirely different way.He made Parliament the en－gine of his will：he pressed or frightened it into do－ing anything he wished.Under his guidance Parlia－ment defied and crushed all other powers，spiritu-ally and temporally，and he did things which noKing or Parliament ever attempted to do—thingsunheard of and terrible.
Then Elizabeth came along.It is true shescolded her Parliament for meddling with matterswith which，in her opinion，they had no concern，and more than once soundly rated the Speaker ofher Commons，but she never carried her quarrelstoo far，and was able to end her disputes by someclever compromise；in other words，she never letParliament down，and that is what I don't believeany wise woman will do in spite of the fears ofsome of the men.
Now，why are we in politics？What is it allabout？Something much bigger than ourselves.Schopenhauer was wrong in nearly everything hewrote about women—and he wrote a lot，but hewas right in one thing.He said，in speaking ofwomen，“the race is to her more than the individu- al，”and I belive that it is true.I feel somehow wedo care about the race as a whole，our very naturemakes us take a forward vision；there is no reasonwhy women should look back—mercifully we haveno political past；we have all the mistakes of sexlegislation with its appalling failures to guide us.
We should know what to avoid，it is no useblaming the men—we made them what they are—and now it is up to us to try and make ourselves—the makers of men—a little more responsible in thefuture.We realize that no one sex can governalone.I believe that one of the reasons why civi－lization has failed so lamentably is that it has had aone－sided government.Don't let us make the mis－take of ever allowing that to happen again.
I can conceive of nothing worse than man-governed world except a woman－governed world—but I can see the combination of the two going for- ward and making civilization more worthy of thename of civilization based on Christianity，notforce.A civilization based on justice.and mercy.Ifeel men have a greater sense of justice and we ofmercy.They must borrow our mercy and we mustuse their justice.We are new brooms；let us seethat we sweep the right rooms.