Sir Robert Walpole
ON A MOTION FOR HIS REMOVAL
It has been observed by several gentlemen，in vindication of this motion，that if it should be carried，neither my life，liberty，nor estate will be affect－ed.But do the honorable gentlemen consider my character and reputation as of no moment？Is it no imputation to be arraigned before this House，in which I have sat forty years，and to have my name transmitted to posterity with disgrace and infamy？I will not conceal my sentiments，that to be named in Parliament as a subject of inquiry is to me a matter of great concern.But I have the satisfaction，at the same time，to reflect，that the impression to be made depends upon the consistency of the charge and the motives of the prosecutors.
If my whole administration is to be scrutinized and arraigned，why are the most favorable parts to be omitted？If facts are to be accumulated on one side，why not on the other？And why may not I be permitted to speak in my own favor？Was I not called by the voice of the King and the nation to remedy the fatal effects of the South Sea project，and to support declining credit？Was I not placed at the head of the treasury when the revenues were in the greatest confusion？Is credit revived，and does it now flourish？Is it not at an incredible height？and if so，to whom must that circumstance be attributed？Has not tranquility been preserved both at home and abroad，notwithstanding a most un-reasonable and violent opposition？Has the true interest of the nation been pursued，or has trade flourished？Have gentlemen produced one instance of this exorbitant power；of the influence which I extend to all parts of the nation；of the tyranny with which I oppress those who oppose，and the liberality with which I reward those who support me？But having first invested me with a kind of mock dignity，and styled me a prime minister，they impute to me an unpardonable abuse of that chimerical authority which they only have created and conferred.If they are really persuaded that the army is annually established by me，that I will have the sole disposal of posts and honors，that I employ this power in the destruction of liberty and the diminution of commerce，let me awaken them from their delusion.Let me expose to their view the real condition of the public weal.Let me show them that the Crown has made no encroachments，that all supplies have been granted by Parliament，that all questions have been debated with the same freedom as before the fatal period in which my counsels are said to have gained the ascendancy an ascendancy from which they deduce the loss of trade，the approach of slavery，the preponderance of prerogative，and the extension of influence.But I am far from believing that they feel those apprehensions which they so earnestly labor to communicate to others；and I have too high an opinion of their sagacity not to conclude that，even in their own judgment，they are complaining of grievances that they do not suffer，and promoting rather their private interest than that of the public.
What is this unbounded sole power which is imputed to me？How has it discovered itself，or how has it been proved？
What have been the effects of the corruption，ambition，and avarice with which I am so abundantly charged？
Have I ever been suspected of being corrupt－ed？A strange phenomenon，a corrupter himself not corrupt！Is ambition imputed to me？Why then do I still continue a commoner？I，who refused a white staff and a peerage？I had，indeed，like to have forgotten the little ornament about my shoulders［the garter］，which gentlemen have so repeatedly mentioned in terms of sarcastic obloquy.But surely，though this may be regarded with envy or indignation in another place，it cannot be supposed to raise any resentment in this House，where many may be pleased to see those honors which their ancestors have worn，restored again to the Commons.
Have I given any symptoms of an avaricious disposition？Have I obtained any grants from the Crown since I have been placed at the head of the treasury？Has my conduct been different from that which others in the same station would have followed？Have I acted wrong in giving the place of auditor to my son，and in providing for my own family？I trust that their advancement will not be imputed to me as a crime，unless it shall be proved that I placed them in offices of trust and responsibility for which they were unfit.
But while I unequivocally deny that I am sole and prime minister，and that to my influence and direction all the measures of the Government must be attributed，yet I will not shrink from the responsibility which attaches to the post I have the honor to hold；and should，during the long period in which I have sat upon this bench，any one step taken by Government be proved to be either disgraceful or disadvantageous to the nation，I am ready to hold myself accountable.
To conclude，sir，though I shall always be proud of the honor of any trust or confidence from His Majesty，yet I shall always be ready to remove from his councils and presence when he thinks fit；and therefore I should think myself very little concerned in the event of the present question，if it were not for the encroachment that will thereby be made upon the prerogatives of the Crown.But I must think that an address to His Majesty to remove one of his servants，without so much as alleging any particular crime against him，is one of the greatest encroachments that was ever made upon the prerogatives of the Crown.And therefore，for the sake of my master，without any regard for my own，I hope all those who have a due regard for our constitution，and for the rights and prerogatives of the Crown，without which our constitution cannot be preserved，will be against this motion.