您的位置:外语教育网 > 基础英语 > 英语口语 > 名人演讲 正文
  • 站内搜索:

托马斯·巴宾顿·麦考莱 论改革法案

2006-07-07 17:15

Thomas Babington Macaulay


March 1,1831

  My honorable friend,the member for the University of Oxford[Sir Robert Inglis]tells us that if we pass this law[extension of suffrage]England will soon be a republic.The reformed House of Commons will,according to him,before it has sat ten years,depose the king and expel the lords from their House.Sir,if my honorable friend could prove this,he would have succeeded in bringing an argument for democracy infinitely stronger than any that is to be found in the works of Paine.My honorable friend's proposition is in fact this:that our monarchical and aristocratically institutions have no hold on the public mind of England;that these institutions are regarded with aversion by a decided majority of the middle class.This,sir,I say,is plainly deducible from his proposition;for he tells us that the representatives of the middle class will inevitably abolish royalty and nobility within ten years;and there is surely no reason to think that the representatives of the middle class will be more inclined to a democratic revolution than their constituents.Now,sir,if I were convinced that the great body of the middle class in England look with aversion on monarchy and aristocracy,I should be forced,much against my will,to come to this conclusion that monarchical and aristocratically institutions are unsuited to my country.Monarchy and aristocracy,valuable and useful as I think them,are still valuable and useful as means and not as ends.The end of government is the happiness of the people,and I do not conceive that,in a country like this,the happiness of the people can be promoted by a form of government in which the middle classes place no confidence,and which exists only because the middle classes have no organ by which to make their sentiments known.But,sir,I am fully convinced that the middle classes sincerely wish to uphold the royal prerogatives and the constitutional rights of the peers.

  The question of parliamentary reform is still behind.But signs,of which it is impossible to misconceive the import,do most clearly Indicate that,unless that question also be speedily settled,property,and order,and all the institutions of this great monarchy,will be exposed to fearful peril.Is it possible that gentlemen long versed in high political affairs can not read these signs?Is it possible that they can really believe that the representative system of England,such as it now is,will last till the year 1860?If not,for what would they have us wait?Would they have us wait merely that we may show to all the world how little we have profited by our own recent experience?

  Would they have us wait,that we may once a-gain hit the exact point where we can neither refuse with authority nor concede with grace?Would they have us wait,that the numbers of the discontented party may become larger,its demands higher,its feelings more acrimonious,its organization more complete?Would they have us wait till the whole tragicomedy of 1827 has been acted over again;till they have been brought into office by acry of“No Reform,”to be reformers,as they were once before brought into office by a cry of“No Popery,”to be emancipators?Have they obliterated from their minds—gladly,perhaps,would some among them obliterate from their minds—the transactions of that year?And have they forgotten all the transactions of the succeeding year?Have they forgotten how the spirit of liberty in Ireland,debarred from its natural outlet,found a vent by forbidden passages?Have they forgotten how we were forced to indulge the Catholics in all the license of rebels,merely because we chose to with- hold from them the liberties of subjects?Do they wait for associations more formidable than that of the Corn Exchange,for contributions larger than the Rent,for agitators more violent than those who,three years ago,divided with the king and the Parliament the sovereignty of Ireland?Do they wait for that last and most dreadful paroxysm of popular rage,for that last and most cruel test of military fidelity?

  Let them wait,if their past experience shall induce them to think that any high honor or any exquisite pleasure is to be obtained by a policy like this.Let them wait,if this strange and fearful infatuation be indeed upon them,that they should not see with their eyes,or hear with their ears,or understand with their heart.But let us know our interest and our duty better.Turn where we may,within,around,the voice of great events is pro-claiming to us:Reform,that you may preserve.Now,therefore,while everything at home and abroad forebodes ruin to those who persist in a hopeless struggle against the spirit of the age;now,while the crash of the proudest throne of the continent is still resounding in our ears;now,while the roof of a British palace affords an ignominious shelter to the exiled heir of forty kings;now,while we see on every side ancient institutions subverted,and great societies dissolved;now,while the heart of England is still sound;now,while old feelings and old associations retina power and a charm which may too soon pass away;now,in this your accepted time,now,in this your day of salvation,take counsel,not of prejudice,not of party spirit,not of the ignominious pride of a fatal consistency,but of history,of reason,of the ages which are past,of the signs of this most portentous time.

  Pronounce in a manner worthy of the expectation with which this great debate has been anticipated,and of the long remembrance Which it will leave behind.Renew the youth of the State.Save property,divided against itself.Save the multitude,endangered by its own ungovernable passions.Save the aristocracy,endangered by its own unpopular power.Save the greatest,and fairest,and most highly civilized community that ever existed,from calamities which may in a few days sweep away all the rich heritage of so many ages of wisdom and glory.The danger is terrible.The time is short.If this bill should be rejected,I pray to God that none of those who concur in rejecting it may ever remember their votes with unavailing remorse,amid the wreck of laws,the confusion of ranks,the spoliation of property,and the dissolution of social order.









王德华 译

相关热词:名人 演讲
科目名称 主讲老师 课时 免费试听 优惠价 购买课程
英语零起点 郭俊霞 30课时 试听 150元/门 购买
综艺乐园 ------ 15课时 试听 100元/门 购买
边玩边学 ------ 10课时 试听 60元/门 购买
情景喜剧 ------ 15课时 试听 100元/门 购买
欢乐课堂 ------ 35课时 试听 150元/门 购买
趣味英语速成 钟 平 18课时 试听 179元/门 购买
剑桥少儿英语预备级 (Pre-Starters) ------ ------ 试听 200元/门 购买
剑桥少儿英语一级 (Starters) ------ ------ 试听 200元/门 购买
剑桥少儿英语二级 (Movers) ------ ------ 试听 200元/门 购买
剑桥少儿英语三级 (Flyers) ------ ------ 试听 200元/门 购买
初级英语口语 ------ 55课时 ------ 350元/门 购买
中级英语口语 ------ 83课时 ------ 350元/门 购买
高级英语口语 ------ 122课时 ------ 350元/门 购买
郭俊霞 北京语言大学毕业,国内某知名中学英语教研组长,教学标兵……详情>>
钟平 北大才俊,英语辅导专家,累计从事英语教学八年,机械化翻译公式发明人……详情>>

  1、凡本网注明 “来源:外语教育网”的所有作品,版权均属外语教育网所有,未经本网授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式使用;已经本网授权的,应在授权范围内使用,且必须注明“来源:外语教育网”。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其法律责任。